| Subject: | Request to commit experts to the MSCWG Pool of Experts conducting reviews under SCP-Procedural Trigger 3 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:07:40 -0400 |
| From: | ESecretariat <secretariat@egmont.org> |
| To: |
Dear Heads of FIU,
We hope this email finds you well.
As you may recall, during the last HoFIU meeting in The Hague (3 July 2019) the MSCWG and PPWG Chairs presented the attached Memorandum (HoFIU-03), seeking approval of the revised version of Procedural Trigger 3 of the Support and Compliance Process (SCP) that would include the results of MER effectiveness assessment for IO.2 and IO.6, as well as the next steps and the needed commitment from the HoFIU for its practical implementation. Following fruitful discussions, the HoFIU:
In order to implement the above-mentioned commitment (letter c), the HoFIU are requested to provide experts in Mutual Evaluations for the MSCWG Pool of Experts, which will be conducting preliminary reviews under Procedural Trigger 3 of the SCP (both for effectiveness and for technical compliance). For that purpose, we would appreciate if you can fill out the following chart and send it back by replying to this email (secretariat@egmont.org). If your FIU has already provided experts for the MSCWG Pool of Experts, please include them in this list in order to corroborate the requested experience in Mutual Evaluations.
|
Name of Expert |
FIU |
Jurisdiction |
Open Email Address |
Telephone Number |
Experience in Mutual Evaluations (assessors training attended / countries assessed / role in the MER process of her or his country) |
|
…………….. |
………………….. |
…………………. |
…………………… |
………………. |
……………….. |
As agreed in The Hague, nominations for the MSCWG Pool of Experts will be open for the next 30 days (until 20 August 2019 COB Toronto Time). In case there are no available experts in the MSCWG for the reviews under the Support and Compliance Process, the practical implementation of this procedure should be assessed in order to determine if it should be replaced by an alternative mechanism that would entail fewer resources for the Egmont Group.
Please find attached for your reference:
Best regards,
The Egmont Group Secretariat